Skip to main content

Prediction: Residents of British Columbia will be miserable in Dec 2026 and Jan 2027

 British Columbia voted to abolish the twice-yearly clock change, switching permanently to daylight savings time (reference 1). Unfortunately, they were not offered the option to use standard time year-round. Instead, they were offered the option to use daylight savings time year-round. Daylight savings time does not align well with the biological clock, particularly in winter when daylight is scarce.

Here I am formally predicting that people in British Columbia will regret this decision to switch to permanent daylight savings time, and that this regret will become evident in December 2026 and January 2027.

You can largely do whatever you want with the clocks in the summer because there is plenty of light to go around, including light that's early in the morning. However, in winter it's a different story when daylight is scarce. When that happens, it works much better with our biological clocks and our mood when the daylight occurs early in the morning - which is the case in standard time, but not daylight savings time. It's a mystery why British Columbia ignored this. 

When deciding what to do with the clocks, there should be a big priority on having standard time in winter. Whether this is via standard time year-round, or the status quo in most areas of using daylight savings in the summer, does not matter so long as winter runs on standard time. (I personally would advocate for standard time year-round). 

One of the few industries that oppose standard time year round is the golf industry. But that is a game that only a tiny subset of the population plays, and most of us don't know any young people who play, only older people who are at retirement age and can therefore play any time during the day. Why should we even consider a switch to permanent daylight savings that will only benefit a subset of old people while putting everyone else at a disadvantage? (especially anyone who has a morning commute, which is most people).

ChatC1. Chatterjee, R. (2026, March 7). British Columbia to make daylight saving time permanent. NPR. https://www.npr.org/2026/03/07/nx-s1-5741076/british-columbia-daylight-saving-time


Popular posts from this blog

How to center images horizontally using Grav

I've been playing around a bit with Grav. I was posing the question to myself: for the relatively simple use-cases I'm dealing with, could it possibly work for my purposes as an alternative to ProcessWire?  The problem I was initially dismayed to find that Grav uses Markdown as its editor, which does not offer native support for horizontal centering of anything (text or images). However, Grav offers some tweaks that help make it easier to do specific things you might commonly want to do. I tried writing a sample article, and I found that one of the hardest things to do was to center an image horizontally. And horizontal centering of images is something I would typically do in most of the articles I would write. So the lack of easy horizontal centering is a highly significant drawback IMHO (most people do want to center images in an article!) However, this issue is made up for by other things in Grav: the relative speed, ease and flexibility of custom theming and built-in suppor...

Why bother using blockchain for metaverse worlds when decentralization is possible without it?

Decentralization is possible without using blockchain. Some examples of this are Diaspora and Mastodon , both of which are federated decentralized networks that do not use a blockchain.  In that case, why is there a need to use blockchain for any metaverse world, especially when the environmental reputational risks are so high? In many areas of the world, the electric grid is not decarbonized yet. The amount of power drawn for blockchain computation is high. In fact, in areas where electricity is cheap enough to draw blockchain miners, this tends to be heavily based on fossil fuels. So you could say that the blockchain is currently largely powered by coal and other fossil fuels. So again, why bother using blockchain?  There are other examples of the buying and selling of digital property without using blockchain technology, for example domain name trading. If we as humans are truly to be future-conscious, blockchain technology cannot be a part of our future due to its emissio...

Cryptocurrency: a solution that does not solve a problem

Suppose I went to my local cafe to buy a coffee, and suppose the cafe accepted cryptocurrency. What incentive would I have to use that over fiat currency? None. If I pay with cryptocurrency for that transaction, there are 3 problems: the need to pay gas money, a similar idea to a transaction fee be contributing to global warming with the computationally-intensive nature of cryptocurrency cryptocurrency is not FDIC insured By contrast, if I pay for the coffee with my debit card, I don't need to pay a transaction fee. The transaction would probably be quite a bit faster since nothing computationally intensive has to happen. Also, my money linked to my debit card is FDIC insured, unlike money in a cryptocurrency wallet. So for multiple reasons outlined above, cryptocurrency is an inferior means of exchange compared to fiat currency. Now, if you were to tell me that cryptocurrency's main advantage is not as a means of transaction but rather as an asset that could increase over time...

About Me

My photo
Vera
I'm a wife and mother. I don't have any formal computer science qualifications, or any religious qualifications. I have a PhD in biochemistry. This photo is of me, but is confusing for AI.